THE DEATH OF BIN LADEN

                And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda. Even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle and defeat his network. Then last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain. And it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we could locate bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice. 

Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body. END QUOTE. This was the initial story of what happened. I am not going to argue whether bin Laden was captured, killed or still alive today. However, there are a lot of conflicting accounts as to how it happened.

            I am not referring to whether it was a 40 minute firefight or who was armed. I am not referring to who actually used one of his wives as a human shield. I care not about these things. Bin Laden is dead and that is good enough for me. Even Al Qaida has admitted that we got him so don’t fall for the conspiracy theories. They would have nothing to gain by lying about it other than fooling the American people, which seems rather pointless. What I am referring to is what did our commander in chief know and when did he know it. From his statement quoted above he was in on the whole deal anxiously awaiting to send out the KILL order. For someone who has called our soldiers murderers, railed against waterboarding and then used the information derived from it, swore to close gimo, attacked our CIA, and sided with the Muslim cleric on the whole 9/11 mosque ordeal, I have a problem with this gung ho theory. There is another story that was leaked from the white house shortly after all of this came about. You can read about it here: http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-obama-hesitated-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/ or here: http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/did-senior-militaryintelligence-officials-overrule-president-obama-regarding-mission-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/

            This is a story that is not being picked up by ANY of the top media outlets so far, including Fox. You would think that this would be one of the biggest news stories of the century. For those who have not read the story on the links, the leak states that Obama was talked out of going through with the mission on several occasions by our real president, Valerie Jarrett. Who is Valerie Jarrett? Well, that is another story. I will try to add a quick explanation here soon. The rest of the team was so fed up with Obama’s indecision that they decided to go ahead with the mission, WITHOUT HIS AUTHORIZATION, and pulled him off of a golf course and into the situation room as it was happening. If you look at the now famous photo of everyone watching in the situation room, this would not only explain why the president is actually sitting in the corner, (with Hilliary and even Biden having a better view than he) but also the semi-confused and even pissed-off look on his face. See pictures to the left. I have asked people what they think about all of this and a friend of mine brought up a good point. He said that there would be total hell to pay for anyone acting against the presidents orders within the military so he doubted the story. At least until I pointed out, that in order to admonish the people involved, you would have to admit to the American people during a campaign season that you did not want to capture or kill Osama Bin Laden!!! The leak also states that Valerie Jarrett and Obama seemed to be setting up Panetta for the fall in case things did go wrong. This was according to Hilliary who also stated that she would defend him in the public square against the administration. Here is a quote from the leak,” Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. So, it sounds like there was a coup going on in the white house and Obama could do nothing about it. Also, according to the leaks, Hilliary was so angry with Obama for not wanting to act on bin Laden that she made sure that Biden was informed all day and even showed up in the situation room long before Obama! Thank you Hilliary for slapping the president in the face for the American people! We appreciate it.  This would explain why Biden had a much better seat than Obama in the famous photo.

                Will we ever know what exactly transpired? Probably not but more information is released every day dominating the media stories. Since this would be the biggest story in our country’s history, why are none of the media outlets covering it? At least we still have the internet. For now, at least.

          WHO IS RICHARD TRUMKA?

Richard Trumka. President of the AFL_CIO, in his own words has stated that he talks with the white house daily and visits at least two or three times a week. This is a very interesting fact when you look at who he is.

Richard Trumka has an extensive past with the unions.  I will only look at some of the more interesting times. Trumka was at one time the president of the United Mine workers.  During  this time he was more of a militant leader and encouraged violence against his own workers and was even quoted as saying “kick the sh*% out of every last one of ‘em” while referring to the mine workers who dared to cross the picket line so they could work to pay their bills and feed their kids. Under the direction of Trumka, the workers followed like sheep and did his bidding. They harassed other workers and former bosses, they trashed their houses, discharged firearms at the offices and even turned off the power to a mineshaft which led to 93 miners being trapped in the mines. It sounds to me like this man should be in prison. If that is not enough for you, look up the name, Eddie York. He was a non-union contractor that was shot in the head and killed by a union thug while the rest of the union thugs threw rocks at the guards that tried to help him. Instead of acknowledging this as an act of murder, Trumka tried to diminish the whole ordeal  with a less than compassionate statement. "I'm saying if you strike a match and put your finger in, common sense tells you you're going to burn your finger”. Other acts of violence seem to have followed this animal for some reason. Look up another incident in Bentleyville Pa. Remember that this man has the president’s ear.

 Are we supposed to believe all of the rhetoric about Obama being surrounded by radicals? Well apparently Trumka does not help to dismiss this argument. He has joined the likes of Fox-Piven, a socialist activist and has stated that he got into the labor movement to promote massive social change. Social change as we all know is another way of saying socialism or social justice.

Trumka has said  recently at a march 14^th union rally that the  days’ events should be seen as part of the larger fight and that the larger fight is between the “haves” and the “have nots”. I wonder which fight he is referring to. It sounds like we are in store for more of Trumka’s bullying and animalistic behavior only this time it will be on a national level.  As for the socialism, his reference to the “haves” and the “have nots” is a reference to a book called Rules For Radicals by Saul Alinski and the strategy used by the socialists and communists. If you look up his past you will find far more than the few examples that I have pointed to. I would also like to repeat the beginning of my article. Richard Trumka. President of the AFL_CIO, in his own words has stated that he talks with the white house daily and visits at least two or three times a week. One can only hope that he goes the way of Jimmy Hoffa and very soon. This man is an enemy of the country and yet another one of the socialists in power that want to dismantle the country and mold it more to the model of socialism.

to budget cut or not

So, the republicans want to kill the children and make grandma eat cat food. The democrats want to save everyone. Does anyone believe this anymore? First of all, ramen noodles are alot cheaper than cat food nowadays so I'm not understanding where they are coming from on that one. As for the republicans, they are playing politics with the budget cuts also. Of course we need a military to protect us but I'm sure there are ways to cut some excess  pork without stopping research on the next best defense project. Are we forgetting that they spend 500$ on a hammer and 1000$ for a toilet seat? Come on now. The democrats want a zero % budget cut. They have said this a few times. This was Harry Reid's platform for the first debate for cuts. So, with one side not wanting to cut at all, and the other side willing to cave in and not only accept but claim victory for a cut that only covered a portion of one month's interest alone, how are we going to get out of the mess?
          I have looked at this and found the perfect way to stop the accusations about how one side is destroying NPR for political purposes and the other is trying to kill our military. If you have ever been laid off or know someone that has been ( im willing to bet that we all at least know of someone nowadays) then you know that without enough money coming in, you'r going to have to cut some extras around the house. We all know that we spend billions of dollars in this country on things that we want and not need. I propose the same thing for the government. Without choosing a political cut or anything that can be argued as having a need and not a hand out, here is the solution. We need to cut 20% of every single program. Every program has waste and every program can learn to be a little more responsible with the money they have. This does not target a specific program so it cannot be attacked by partisans. It is  fair and more than necessary.  Because of the many spending problems we have right now, I had to use the 2010 budget and it was just an estimate. O.K. so in 2010 the total budget was 3.46 trillion dollars. If we cut 20% of that, it would be 692 billion (if my wife's math is correct haha)  Now that is a cut we could all agree on.
          Lets take it another way.  All numbers are from 2010. the defense department spent 663.7 billion dollars. If we cut 20 % of that it would be, 132,740,000,000 (thats almost 133 billion) in just one cut. remember 20% would be mostly waste. The department of transportation spent 72.5 billion. 20% of that would be 14.5 million.  Also, in waste. The department of health and human services spent 78.7 billion. 20% of that would be 15,740,000,000 (almost 16 billion). You see how fast these add up. I like this method even better because it breaks everything down one at a time. As congress cuts these programs they can add additional cuts necessary according to how relevant the program is.  With just the top three spenders of 2010, we have cut a total of 148,494,500,000 dollars.  That would be 148.5 billion dollars that we really could do without.  We personally cut 35% when i was laid off so we all know its possible and 20% is not going to kill any program.